The Day Your Bank Account Gets Frozen Because Someone Doesn’t Like Your Politics

 

FIRST WATCH THIS VIDEO- All Americans Will Lose Their Home, Income And Power By December 27, 2025

Florida just became the first state to ban government-controlled digital currency. Here’s why that matters for every family.

MUST WATCH THIS VIDEO…! This might sound alarming, unbelievable, even preposterous. And that’s exactly what they want you to think. After all, the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.

Let me tell you a story that should terrify every parent in America.

In 2022, Canadian truckers protested COVID mandates. You might have agreed with them. You might have thought they were wrong.

But here’s what happened next:

The Canadian government invoked emergency powers and froze 210 bank accounts holding $7.8 million.

No trial. No due process. Just the government reaching into private citizens’ finances and turning off their money like flipping a light switch.

Families couldn’t buy groceries. Parents couldn’t pay rent. People who’d donated $50 to the protest found their accounts frozen.

And it happened in a Western democracy. In 2022. Not in some dystopian novel.

Now imagine that kind of power in a world where all money is digital, trackable, and programmable.

Where the government or corporations can monitor every purchase you make, decide what you’re allowed to buy, and shut off your financial life if you step out of line.

That world is closer than you think.

And Florida just became the first state to say: Not here. Not ever.

What Nobody’s Telling You About Digital Currency

Right now, only about 14% of U.S. consumer payments are made with cash. The rest are digital — cards, apps, electronic transfers.

That’s convenient. I use my debit card constantly.

But here’s what most people don’t realize:

Every digital payment leaves a trail. Banks and payment platforms automatically record where you shop, when you shop, what you buy.

Right now, that data is somewhat protected by privacy laws and corporate policies.

But what if the government issued its own digital currency — and gave itself direct access to all that data?

That’s exactly what a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) would do.

A CBDC is government-issued digital money that can be:

• Tracked in real-time
• Programmed with restrictions
• Remotely controlled or frozen
• Set to expire if not spent by a deadline

This isn’t hypothetical. It’s already happening.

Important below:

You might be living in one of America’s deathzones and not have a clue about it
What if that were you? What would YOU do?

In the next few minutes, I’m going to show you the U.S. Nuclear Target map, where you’ll find out if you’re living in one of America’s Deathzones.

What China Is Already Doing With Digital Currency

China’s digital yuan is 100% trackable and programmable.

Authorities can:

• Monitor every transaction in detail
• Set limits on how money is used
• Control which goods can be purchased
• Make money expire (use it by deadline or lose it)

Translation: The government can watch everything you buy and decide whether you’re allowed to buy it.

Think that can’t happen here?

President Biden ordered studies into a U.S. CBDC in 2022.

Over 1.5 billion people worldwide already live in countries with CBDC pilot programs.

And the early results should alarm every American who values freedom.

---

How Governments Use Digital Currency to Control Citizens

Nigeria: Force People Into Digital Money by Choking Off Cash

Nigeria launched a government digital currency. Adoption was under 0.5% — people didn’t want it.

So the government created a cash shortage to force people onto the digital system.

Result? Public chaos. Economic disruption. Riots.

But the government got what it wanted: control.

Thailand: Your Money Only Works Where Government Allows

Thailand’s new digital wallet restricts where people can spend money — limiting purchases to government-approved items in your home district.

Think about what that means:

You can’t drive to the next town and buy what you want with your own money. The government decides what’s “approved” and what’s not.

The Pattern Is Clear

When governments control the currency, they control the people.

And once that infrastructure is built, there’s no putting the genie back in the bottle.

---

Florida Drew the Line (And Your State Should Too)

This year, Florida enacted the first-in-the-nation law explicitly banning any federal CBDC from being treated as money in our state.

Translation: If the federal government issues a “digital dollar” that allows tracking or control, it won’t be recognized in Florida.

Governor DeSantis signed it with this statement:

“The government and large credit card companies should not have the power to shut off access to your hard-earned money because they disagree with your politics.”

At least a dozen other states — including Indiana, Alabama, and South Dakota — are considering similar bans.

Why?

Because we’ve already seen what happens when financial institutions can punish people for their beliefs.

SHOCKING CONTENT BELOW!

---

The “Debanking” Scandal: When Banks Cancel You for Your Views

Financial surveillance isn’t just a government problem. Corporations are doing it too.

PayPal Wanted to Fine You $2,500 for “Misinformation”

Last year, PayPal briefly announced a policy allowing them to withdraw $2,500 from your account for spreading “misinformation.”

They backed off after massive backlash and claimed it was an “error.”

But the intent was clear: A tech platform thought it could directly punish you — with your own money — for saying something they didn’t like.

UK Banker Scandal: Closing Accounts Over Politics

In the UK, a major bank (Coutts, under NatWest Group) closed politician Nigel Farage’s account because his political views didn’t align with the bank’s “values.”

Internal documents showed his opinions on Brexit were noted in the decision.

It wasn’t isolated. Banks in Britain were shutting over 1,000 accounts every working day.

The scandal forced resignations of top bank executives and a government inquiry into what’s now called “debanking.”

It’s Happening in America Too

JPMorgan Chase quietly dropped rapper Kanye West, giving him 60 days to move his accounts after public controversies.

Chase bank briefly barred General Mike Flynn’s family, citing “reputational risk,” then reversed after public outcry.

These are famous people with resources to fight back.

What happens to you — a regular parent, a small business owner, a church donor — if a bank decides you’re “risky” because of your politics or faith?

---

How This Threatens Every Parent and Family

Let me make this personal.

Imagine:

• You donate to your church’s building fund. Your payment app flags “religious organization” and limits future donations.
• You buy a children’s book about faith. The algorithm notes “controversial content” and downgrades your credit score.
• You attend a school board meeting protesting curriculum. Someone films you. Six months later, your bank account is suddenly “under review for reputational risk.”
• Your teenager uses your card to buy a hunting rifle for a school shooting sports team. The transaction is flagged. Your family is now on a watchlist.

Sound far-fetched?

Florida just banned credit card companies from using special tracking codes that would create a registry of gun purchases.

Why? Because major card networks were discussing tagging firearm store purchases “to monitor mass shootings.”

Privacy advocates warned it would be misused to surveil lawful gun owners.

Florida said: Not here.

---

Your Right to Privacy Starts With Cash

Here’s something the digital payment companies don’t want you to know:

72% of Americans want to keep the ability to make some purchases completely private — by using cash.

74% of Americans oppose any digital dollar that lets government control what people can buy.

Over half of Americans still carry cash daily or weekly.

45% say they’d be upset if the U.S. became fully cashless. (Only 9% would be happy.)

Even Gen Z and Millennials — the most digital generations — about half say they’re not ready to give up cash, mostly due to privacy and fees.

Cash = privacy and autonomy.

When you pay with cash:

• No data trail to mine
• No algorithm deciding if you’re “allowed” to buy something
• No corporation or government watching
• No fees extracted

That’s why they want to eliminate it.

All Americans Will Lose Their Home, Income And Power By December 27, 2025

Watch the video below!

---

The Slippery Slope We’re Already On

We’ve seen the preview:

• Stores and stadiums going “card only”
• Apps that won’t accept cash
• Schools forcing digital payment platforms (with fees)
• Venues where your legal tender is “not accepted here”

Each step normalizes a cashless world.

And once cash is gone, every transaction you make can be:

• Tracked
• Analyzed
• Sold to marketers
• Reviewed by algorithms
• Flagged for “suspicious activity”
• Used against you

In China, apps like WeChat Pay are convenient — and integrated with government monitoring.

Reports show accounts automatically frozen for:

• Buying religious materials
• Having low “social credit” scores
• Behavior the government doesn’t like

Your money turned off as punishment.

---

Why Florida’s Law Matters for Every State

Florida’s Consumer Payment Rights law does three critical things:

1. Bans Federal CBDCs

No programmable, trackable government digital currency will be recognized in Florida.

2. Protects Against Financial Discrimination

Banks and payment processors can’t cut you off for lawful political or religious activity.

3. Preserves Your Right to Use Cash

Legal tender remains legal — you can’t be forced into digital-only systems.

This is preventative legislation.

It’s easier to stop surveillance infrastructure from being built than to dismantle it after the fact.

Think of it like this:

You don’t wait until your house is on fire to install smoke detectors.

You don’t wait until your kid is drowning to teach them to swim.

And you don’t wait until government has total financial control to protect freedom.

---

The Europe Lesson: Even They’re Worried

The European Union — not exactly a libertarian stronghold — is moving to legally guarantee citizens’ right to use cash alongside any digital euro.

Why?

Because even EU regulators recognize that inclusion and privacy require multiple options.

They understand what happens when a single system has monopoly power over money.

If Europe gets it, why can’t Washington?

---

What This Means for Your Family

Practical implications if we don’t act:

Your Kids’ Future

• Every purchase they make tracked from childhood
• Credit scores influenced by “approved” vs “unapproved” purchases
• Social pressure to conform because financial systems punish deviation

Your Business

• Can’t accept cash (excludes customers)
• Must use approved payment processors (with fees and surveillance)
• Risk of being “debanked” if someone doesn’t like your values

Your Faith

• Churches monitored through donation tracking
• Religious material purchases flagged
• Financial pressure to moderate beliefs

Your Politics

• Donations tracked and used against you
• Protest support = financial risk
• Self-censorship to protect bank account

Emergencies

• Power outage = no way to buy food (digital systems down)
• Banking error = frozen out of economy
• Cyber attack = commerce stops entirely

Cash is the backup system when digital fails.

Cash is the privacy tool when surveillance overreaches.

Cash is the freedom option when corporations or government get too powerful.

---

What You Can Do Right Now

1. Support Cash Acceptance Laws in Your State

Find your state legislators. Tell them to follow Florida’s lead.

Model language: “I support legislation banning federal CBDCs and protecting consumers’ right to use cash. Financial freedom and privacy must be protected.”

2. Use Cash Regularly

The more we use it, the harder it is to eliminate.

• Pay cash at local businesses when possible
• Keep cash in your emergency kit ($500+ in small bills)
• Teach your kids to use physical money

3. Demand Transparency from Banks

Ask your bank:

• What’s your policy on closing accounts for political/religious reasons?
• Do you share transaction data with third parties?
• Will you commit to not participating in CBDC surveillance?

If they won’t answer, find a bank that will.

4. Support the Payment Choice Act

Federal legislation requiring businesses to accept cash for transactions under $500.

Contact your U.S. Representative and Senators. Tell them to co-sponsor it.

5. Educate Your Community

Most people have no idea this is happening.

Share this article. Talk about it at church, PTA meetings, your book club.

This isn’t partisan. It’s freedom.

---

The Bottom Line

Your money should be yours.

Period.

No government should be able to program it, track it, or turn it off because you donated to the “wrong” cause or said something unpopular.

No corporation should be able to cut you off from the financial system because an algorithm flagged you as “risky.”

No payment processor should be able to fine you for “misinformation” or wrong-think.

These are not hypothetical risks. They’re happening right now in other countries — and starting to happen here.

Florida drew a line in the sand.

The question is whether the rest of America will do the same — or sleepwalk into a surveillance state where every purchase is monitored and freedom is one frozen account away from extinction.

I know what I’m choosing.

I’m choosing freedom.

I’m choosing privacy.

I’m choosing a future where my kids can spend their hard-earned money without Big Brother or Big Tech watching every transaction.

Florida made the first move. Now it’s your state’s turn.

The most shocking videos in the world!

source- rebekahricks.substack.com

I also invite you to take a look at this site- www.whatfinger.com

The Hidden Experiments--When Governments Tested On Their Own Citizens

 

The Hidden Experiments: When the U.S. Government Tested on Its Own People

For decades, the American public has been reassured that medical ethics, federal protections, and the Nuremberg Code ensure that human beings will never again be used as experimental material without their informed consent.

Important below:

You might be living in one of America’s deathzones and not have a clue about it
What if that were you? What would YOU do?

In the next few minutes, I’m going to show you the U.S. Nuclear Target map, where you’ll find out if you’re living in one of America’s Deathzones.

Yet history tells a different story.

Across the 20th century—and even into the 1990s—there are documented cases in which U.S. agencies tested chemicals, biological agents, radiation, psychological techniques, and unapproved drugs on ordinary people who never agreed to participate. Many of these operations remained classified for years. Some still are.

In this article, I explore two particularly disturbing cases—Frank Olson’s death and the Oakville, Washington “blob rain”—and place them within the broader, undeniable pattern of non-consensual human experimentation conducted by the U.S. government.

1. Frank Olson: A Scientist Who Knew Too Much

Frank Olson was not simply a scientist who “fell” from a hotel window in 1953.

He was a decorated U.S. Army biochemist at Fort Detrick, deeply involved in biological warfare research, pathogen development, and interrogation-related chemical programs that were quietly absorbed into the CIA’s notorious MK-ULTRA project.

By late 1953, Olson had:

• Become disturbed by what he had witnessed

• Expressed a desire to leave the program

• Spoken openly about the ethical horror of what was being developed

• Indicated he was considering exposing what was happening

This made him a threat. A whistleblower. And a liability.

Shortly before his death, Olson was surreptitiously drugged with LSD by CIA colleagues. Rather than reassuring him, this seems to have unmoored him further, making the agency fear that he might reveal secrets relating not just to LSD, but to covert biological and chemical testing programs operating in Europe and potentially at home.

What happened next has been debated for decades:

• The government called it suicide.

• Forensic evidence strongly suggests homicide.

• Injuries inconsistent with a fall were discovered during his exhumation.

• Multiple CIA insiders later admitted Olson had become “a security problem.”

The deepest fear within Fort Detrick and the CIA was not Olson’s mental instability.

It was what he was threatening to reveal.

His death belongs in the long, grim lineage of human experimentation without consent. But he is unique because he was not merely a victim—he was someone who tried to speak out and may have been killed to prevent it.

2. Oakville, Washington (1994): When Gelatinous “Blobs” Fell From the Sky

Forty-one years after Olson’s death, residents of a rural town in Washington experienced something just as eerie—and still unexplained.

On August 7, 1994, during a heavy rain, translucent gelatinous blobs fell across Oakville. People touched them. Pets ingested them. Many residents became violently ill within days.

A hospital lab technician reported seeing white blood cells under the microscope—something that should not fall from the sky.

State labs later contradicted that assessment, claiming the samples “contained no nuclei.”

No samples survive today.

And in the Files of the Unexplained episode on the event, several interviewees—including at least one person claiming former military connections—suggested that what rained down resembled the residue of bio-aerosol drift tests, similar to those documented from the Cold War era.

The documentary made a compelling and unsettling point:

This tiny town’s bizarre experience mirrors a long history of open-air testing on unsuspecting Americans.

3. The Dark Pattern: Human Experiments the U.S. Government Has Already Admitted To

The U.S. government has acknowledged—through declassified documents, lawsuits, and congressional hearings—that it has repeatedly exposed unwitting citizens to biological, chemical, and radiological agents.

Here are just a few cases from the extensive list:

Operation Sea-Spray (1950)

The U.S. Navy released Serratia marcescens over San Francisco to test airborne spread. Residents became ill; at least one person died.

St. Louis and Winnipeg (1953–1954)

“Urban dispersion studies” involved spraying zinc cadmium sulfide over neighborhoods, including schoolyards.

New York City Subway Biological Tests (1966)

Army scientists released Bacillus globigii into subway tunnels to study rapid spread in enclosed spaces.

MK-ULTRA (1953–1973)

Perhaps the most infamous: unwitting subjects—including patients, prisoners, citizens in bars, and even CIA employees—were dosed with LSD, hypnotics, and other substances without consent.

The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (1932–1972)

Hundreds of Black men were deceived and denied treatment so researchers could study the “natural progress” of the disease.

Guatemala Syphilis Experiments (1946–1948)

U.S. Public Health Service officials infected people—including prisoners and psychiatric patients—without their knowledge.

Fallout on U.S. Citizens

Nuclear testing released radioactive materials across western states, exposing entire populations to dangerous doses.

Radiation experiments on hospital patients (1940s-1970s)

Terminally ill and mentally disabled individuals were injected with plutonium, uranium, and radioactive iron without informed consent.

Prisoner Experiments

Thousands of inmates were subjected to chemical exposure, dermatological burns, and mind-altering drugs.

Psychological Torture Research

Behavioral modification experiments on soldiers, psychiatric patients, and unwitting civilians were conducted under CIA behavioral programs like ARTICHOKE and MK-SEARCH.

These are not fringe claims—they’re documented in congressional records, court settlements, FOIA releases, and investigative journalism.

Once you understand the history, the Oakville event no longer seems like an absurd anomaly.

It looks like a continuation.

4. Why These Stories Matter Today

The ethical codes meant to protect human beings—Nuremberg, Belmont, the Common Rule, and state-level protections—were written after many of these experiments were already underway.

And none of them apply to:

• intelligence operations

• classified military research

• national security exemptions

• foreign “joint operations”

• contracted private labs working off-the-books

Which means a vast amount of testing historically occurred outside the reach of federal human-subject protections.

There is no guarantee it has stopped.

Frank Olson’s death, the Oakville event, and the long list of government experiments fuel a disturbing but reasonable question:

If this much is admitted, what remains hidden?

Conclusion

Frank Olson’s story is not just a Cold War tragedy. It is a warning.

He was a scientist who participated in secret programs, grew ethically horrified, expressed a desire to expose what was happening—and then died under violent, suspicious circumstances.

The Oakville blob incident is not just a quirky unsolved mystery. It is a modern echo of documented cases where the government tested substances in the open air, directly over civilian populations.

And the broader historical record of U.S. experimentation shows a pattern:

When secrecy meets power, human beings have repeatedly been used as test subjects without their consent.

We owe it to those who suffered—and to future generations—to keep documenting, questioning, and refusing to forget.

Complete References & Source List

1. Foundational Ethics & Legal Framework

Nuremberg Code

• “The Nuremberg Code (1947).” UNC Human Research Ethics.

The Common Rule

• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. “Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (‘Common Rule’).”

California Human Experimentation Law

• California Health & Safety Code §§ 24170–24179.5.

• LSU Biotech Law. “California Laws on Human Experimentation.”

2. General History of Unethical U.S. Experiments

Overviews & General Histories

• Wikipedia. “Unethical Human Experimentation in the United States.”

• NBC News. “Ugly Past of U.S. Human Experiments Uncovered.”

• Howard Nema. “The Long History of U.S. Government Secret Experimentation on American Citizens.”

• MR Online. “Dark History: How the U.S. Experimented on Its Own People.”

• The People’s Voice. “U.S. Government Human Experiments.”

• Science Sensei. “Times When Governments Conducted Experiments on Their Own People.”

• Whiteout Press. “Secret Government Experiments on the American People.”

• Health Impact News. “From MK-ULTRA Mind Control to Lab-Created Viruses: How the U.S. Government Keeps Experimenting on Its Own Citizens.”

• Natural News. “10 Times the U.S. Government Illegally Experimented on Humans.”

• ListVerse. “Top 10 U.S. Government Experiments Done on Its Own Citizens.”

3. Academic / Scholarly Sources on Human-Subject Ethics

• Constantin, A. “Human Subject Research: International and Regional Perspectives.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, PMC.

4. Specific Historical Experiments (Documented Cases)

Operation Sea-Spray (1950)

• Unethical Human Experimentation in the U.S. (Wikipedia) – Entry details the San Francisco bacterial release.

• Various declassified Navy documents available through FOIA (referenced in NBC article above).

St. Louis/Wichita Zinc Cadmium Sulfide Tests (1953–54)

• U.S. Army Chemical Corps documents (summarized in NBC investigation).

New York Subway Bacillus globigii Tests (1966)

• U.S. Army Test 68-10 summary (reported in Senate hearings; referenced in multiple articles linked above).

Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932–72)

• CDC. “Tuskegee Timeline.”

• Wikipedia. Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.

Guatemala STD Experiments (1946–48)

• Presidential Commission for Bioethical Issues. 2011 findings.

Cold War Radiation Experiments

• U.S. Department of Energy. “Human Radiation Experiments Collection.”

5. Frank Olson (CIA / MK-ULTRA)

• Wikipedia. “Frank Olson.”

• Olson family legal documents and exhumation forensic report (1994).

• CIA MK-ULTRA materials, partially declassified (1977).

• NBC, New York Times, and Guardian investigative coverage.

• Dr. G: America’s Most Shocking Cases, Season 1, Episode 2 – “Conspiracy Theory (Frank Olson).”

• Spyscape. “Frank Olson: The CIA’s Secret Quest for Mind Control.”

• Eric Olson’s public statements and interviews (various).

6. Oakville, Washington “Blob Rain” (1994)

• IFLScience. “Oakville Blobs: In 1994, Mysterious Gelatinous Goo Rained Down on Washington.”

• ScienceFocus (BBC). “What Were the Oakville Blobs?”

• KUOW Public Radio. “Return of the Blobs: SW Washington Revisited by Decades-Old Goo Mystery.”

• Discovery UK. “What Were the Oakville Blobs and What Caused Them?”

• Washington State Department of Ecology – Lab reports referenced in public summaries.

• Files of the Unexplained (Netflix) – Episode “Bizarre Blobs of Washington.”

7. TV Documentaries & Media Sources

• Files of the Unexplained (Netflix). Episode: “Bizarre Blobs of Washington.”

• Dr. G: America’s Most Shocking Cases. S1E2 — Frank Olson case.

• Errol Morris, Wormwood (Netflix docudrama on Frank Olson).

• Assorted interviews cited within these programs.

8. Additional Background / Secondary Sources

• LiveScience. “7 Evil Medical Experiments.”

• Ranker.com databases on unethical experiments.

• TheLastAmericanVagabond. “Human Experimentation Rampant in the United States.”

I also invite you to take a look at this site- www.whatfinger.com